NORVASC PROTECT Amlodipine Besilate / Atorvastatin Calcium 10mg / 20mg Tablet 1's
Indications/Uses
In these patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors, amlodipine/atorvastatin is indicated for: Hypertension: The amlodipine component is indicated for the first-line treatment of hypertension and can be used as the sole agent to control blood pressure (BP) in the majority of patients. Patients not adequately controlled on a single antihypertensive agent (other than amlodipine) may benefit from the addition of the amlodipine component of Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect), in the same manner as they would benefit from the addition of amlodipine alone.
Amlodipine is also indicated to reduce the risk of fatal CHD and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and to reduce the risk of stroke.
Coronary Artery Disease: The amlodipine component is indicated to reduce the risk of coronary revascularization procedures and the need for hospitalization due to angina in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).
Chronic Stable Angina: The amlodipine component is indicated for the first-line treatment of myocardial ischemia, whether due to fixed obstruction (stable angina) and/or vasospasm/vasoconstriction (Prinzmetal's or variant angina) of coronary vasculature. Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) may be used where the clinical presentation suggests a possible vasospastic/vasoconstrictive component but where vasospasm/vasoconstriction has not been confirmed. Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) may be used alone or in combination with other antianginal drugs in patients with angina that is refractory to nitrates and/or adequate doses of beta-blockers.
Dyslipidemia: The atorvastatin component is indicated as an adjunct to diet for the treatment of patients with elevated total cholesterol (total-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein B (apo B), and triglycerides (TG) and to increase high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia (heterozygous familial and nonfamilial hypercholesterolemia), combined (mixed) hyperlipidemia (Fredrickson Types IIa and IIb), elevated serum TG levels (Fredrickson Type IV), and in patients with dysbetalipoproteinemia (Fredrickson Type III) who do not respond adequately to diet.
The atorvastatin component is also indicated for the reduction of total C and LDL-C in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).
Prevention of Cardiovascular Complications: In patients without clinically evident cardiovascular disease (CVD), and with or without dyslipidemia, but with multiple risk factors for CHD such as smoking, hypertension, diabetes, low HDL-C, or a family history of early CHD, atorvastatin is indicated to: Reduce the risk of fatal CHD and non-fatal MI; Reduce the risk of stroke; Reduce the risk of revascularization procedures and angina pectoris.
In patients with clinically evident CHD, atorvastatin is indicated to: Reduce the risk of non-fatal MI; Reduce the risk of fatal and non-fatal stroke; Reduce the risk for revascularization procedures; Reduce the risk of hospitalization for congestive heart failure (CHF); Reduce the risk of angina.
Pediatric Patients (10-17 years of age): Atorvastatin is indicated as an adjunct to diet to reduce total-C, LDL-C, and apo B levels in boys and postmenarchal girls, 10 to 17 years of age, with heterozygous FH if after an adequate trial of diet therapy the following findings are present: LDL-C remains ≥190 mg/dL; or LDL-C remains ≥160 mg/dL, and There is a positive family history of premature CVD or Two or more other CVD risk factors are present in the pediatric patient.
Dosage/Direction for Use
The dosage range for Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) is 5 mg/10 mg to a maximum dose of 10 mg/20 mg once daily. The starting dose and maintenance dose should be individualized on the basis of both effectiveness and tolerance for each individual component in the treatment of hypertension/angina and dyslipidemia. Current treatment guidelines should be consulted to establish treatment goals for patients based on their baseline characteristics. Doses may be taken at any time of day with or without food.
As a component of multiple risk factor intervention, amlodipine/atorvastatin should be used in addition to non-pharmacological measures, including an appropriate diet, exercise and weight reduction in obese patients, smoking cessation, and to treat underlying medical problems, when the response to these measures have been inadequate.
Following initiation and/or titration of amlodipine/atorvastatin, lipid levels should be analyzed and BP measured within 2 to 4 weeks, and dosage of amlodipine and atorvastatin components should be adjusted accordingly. Titration for BP response may proceed more rapidly if clinically warranted.
Initial Therapy: Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) may be used to initiate treatment in patients with hyperlipidemia and either hypertension or angina. The recommended starting dose of Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) should be based on the appropriate combination of recommendations for the amlodipine and atorvastatin components considered separately. The maximum dose of the amlodipine component of Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) is 10 mg once daily. The maximum dose of the atorvastatin component of Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) is 20 mg once daily.
Substitution Therapy: Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) may be substituted for its individually titrated components. Patients may be given the equivalent dose of Amlodipine besilate and Atorvastatin calcium or a dose of Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) with increased amounts of amlodipine, atorvastatin or both for additional antianginal effects, BP lowering, or lipid lowering effect.
Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) may be used to provide additional therapy for patients already on one of its components. As initial therapy for one indication and continuation of treatment of the other, the recommended starting dose of Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) should be selected based on continuation of the component being used previously and on the recommended starting dose for the component being added.
Concomitant Medication (see also Interactions): The amlodipine component of Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) has been safely co-administered with thiazide diuretics, alpha blockers, beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, long-acting nitrates, and with sublingual nitroglycerine. Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) has also been safely administered with the aforementioned medicines.
The atorvastatin component of Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) may be used in combination with a bile acid-binding resin for additive effect on lipid lowering. The combination of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors and fibrates should generally be avoided (see Precautions and Interactions).
Special Populations and Special Considerations for Dosing: Coronary Artery Disease (Amlodipine Studies): For patients with CAD, the recommended dosage range is 5 mg to 10 mg of amlodipine once daily. In clinical studies, the majority of patients required 10 mg once daily (see Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Amlodipine/Atorvastatin Pharmacodynamics: Use in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease under Actions).
Primary Hypercholesterolemia and Combined (Mixed) Hyperlipidemia (Atorvastatin Studies): The majority of patients are controlled with 10 mg of atorvastatin once daily. A therapeutic response is evident within 2 weeks, and the maximum response is usually achieved within 4 weeks. The response is maintained during chronic therapy.
Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (Atorvastatin Studies): In a compassionate-use study of patients with homozygous FH, most patients responded to 80 mg of atorvastatin with a greater than 15% reduction in LDL-C (18%-45%).
Use in Patients with Impaired Hepatic Function: Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) should not be used in patients with hepatic impairment (see Contraindications and Precautions).
Use in Patients with Impaired Renal Function: No adjustment of the dose is required in patients with impaired renal function (see Precautions).
Use in the Elderly: No adjustment of the dose is required in elderly patients.
Use in Children: There have been no studies conducted to determine the safety or effectiveness of Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) (combination product) in pediatric populations. However, there have been studies in pediatric populations with amlodipine alone and atorvastatin alone (see as follows).
Studies with amlodipine: The recommended antihypertensive oral dose in pediatric patients aged 6 to 17 years is 2.5 mg to 5 mg once daily. Doses in excess of 5 mg daily have not been studied in pediatric patients (see Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics under Actions).
The effect of amlodipine on BP in patients less than 6 years of age is not known.
Studies with atorvastatin: Use in Pediatric Patients with Severe Dyslipidemias: For patients aged 10 years and above, the recommended starting dose is 10 mg of atorvastatin per day. The dose may be increased to 80 mg daily according to the response and tolerability. Doses should be individualized according to the recommended goal of therapy (see Indications/Uses and Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics under Actions). Adjustments should be made at intervals of 4 weeks or more.
Experience in pediatric patients younger than 10 years of age is derived from open-label studies (see Adverse Reactions and Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics: Special Populations under Actions).
Use in Combination with Other Medicinal Compounds: Studies with atorvastatin: In cases where co-administration of atorvastatin with cyclosporine, telaprevir, the combination tipranavir/ritonavir, or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is necessary, the dose of atorvastatin should not exceed 10 mg.
Use of atorvastatin is not recommended in patients taking letermovir co-administered with cyclosporine.
Pharmacokinetic drug interactions that result in increased systemic concentration of atorvastatin have also been noted with other human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (lopinavir/ritonavir, saquinavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir, fosamprenavir, fosamprenavir/ritonavir and nelfinavir), hepatitis C (HCV) protease inhibitors (boceprevir, elbasvir/grazoprevir, simeprevir), clarithromycin, itraconazole, and letermovir. Caution should be used when co-prescribing atorvastatin and appropriate clinical assessment is recommended to ensure that the lowest dose necessary of atorvastatin is employed (see Skeletal Muscle Effects under Precautions and Interactions).
Overdosage
Due to amlodipine's and atorvastatin's extensive drug binding to plasma proteins, hemodialysis is not expected to significantly enhance Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) clearance (see also Pharmacology: Pharmacokinetics: Renal Insufficiency under Actions).
Additional data on amlodipine ingestion suggest that gross overdosage could result in excessive peripheral vasodilatation and possibly reflex tachycardia. Marked and probably prolonged systemic hypotension up to and including shock with fatal outcome have been reported. Administration of activated charcoal to healthy volunteers immediately or up to 2 hours after ingestion of amlodipine 10 mg has been shown to significantly decrease amlodipine absorption. Gastric lavage may be worthwhile in some cases. Clinically significant hypotension due to amlodipine overdosage calls for active cardiovascular support including frequent monitoring of cardiac and respiratory function, elevation of extremities, and attention to circulating fluid volume and urine output. A vasoconstrictor may be helpful in restoring vascular tone and BP, provided that there is no contraindication to its use. Intravenous calcium gluconate may be beneficial in reversing the effects of calcium channel blockade.
Additional data on atorvastatin ingestion suggest that there is no specific treatment for atorvastatin overdosage. Should an overdose occur, the patient should be treated symptomatically and supportive measures instituted, as required.
Administration
Contraindications
Have active liver disease or unexplained persistent elevations of serum transaminases >3 x the upper limit of normal [ULN].
Are pregnant, breast-feeding, or of childbearing potential who are not using adequate contraceptive measures. Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) should be administered to women of childbearing age only when such patients are highly unlikely to conceive and have been informed of the potential hazards to the fetus.
*Amlodipine is a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker.
Special Precautions
Use in Patients with Impaired Hepatic Function (see also Contraindications): Hepatic Effects: As with other lipid-lowering agents of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor class, moderate (>3 x ULN) elevations of serum transaminases have been reported following therapy with atorvastatin. Liver function was monitored during pre-marketing as well as post-marketing clinical studies of atorvastatin given at doses of 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg.
Persistent increases in serum transaminases (>3 x ULN on two or more occasions) occurred in 0.7% of patients who received atorvastatin in these clinical trials. The incidence of these abnormalities was 0.2%, 0.2%, 0.6%, and 2.3% for 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg respectively. Increases were generally not associated with jaundice or other clinical signs or symptoms. When the dosage of atorvastatin was reduced, or drug treatment interrupted or discontinued, transaminase levels returned to pre-treatment levels. Most patients continued treatment on a reduced dose of atorvastatin without sequelae.
Liver function tests should be performed before the initiation of treatment and periodically thereafter. Patients who develop any signs or symptoms suggesting liver injury should have liver function tests performed. Patients who develop increased transaminase levels should be monitored until the abnormality(ies) resolve(s). Should an increase in alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate transaminase (AST) >3 x ULN persist, reduction of dose or withdrawal of Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) is recommended. Atorvastatin can cause an elevation in transaminases (see Adverse Reactions).
Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) should be used with caution in patients who consume substantial quantities of alcohol and/or have a history of liver disease. Active liver disease or unexplained persistent transaminase elevations are contraindications to the use of Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) (see Contraindications).
Skeletal Muscle Effects: Myalgia has been reported in atorvastatin-treated patients (see Adverse Reactions). Myopathy, defined as muscle aching or muscle weakness in conjunction with increases in creatine phosphokinase (CPK) values >10 x ULN, should be considered in any patient with diffuse myalgias, muscle tenderness or weakness, and/or marked elevation of CPK. Patients should be advised to promptly report unexplained muscle pain, tenderness or weakness, particularly if accompanied by malaise or fever. Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) therapy should be discontinued if markedly elevated CPK levels occur or myopathy is diagnosed or suspected. The risk of myopathy is increased with concurrent administration of drugs that increase the systemic concentration of atorvastatin (see Interactions and Pharmacology: Pharmacokinetics under Actions). Many of these drugs inhibit cytochrome P450 3A4 metabolism and/or drug-transport. CYP3A4 is the primary hepatic isozyme known to be involved in the biotransformation of atorvastatin. Physicians considering combined therapy with atorvastatin and fibric acid derivatives, erythromycin, immunosuppressive drugs, azole antifungals, HIV/HCV protease inhibitors, HCV NS5A/NS5B inhibitors, letermovir, or lipid-modifying doses of niacin should carefully weigh the potential benefits and risks and should carefully monitor patients for any signs and symptoms of muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness, particularly during the initial months of therapy and during any periods of upward dosage titration of either drug. Therefore, lower starting and maintenance doses of the atorvastatin component should also be considered when taken concomitantly with the aforementioned drugs (see Dosage & Administration). The concurrent use of atorvastatin and fusidic acid is not recommended, therefore, temporary suspension of atorvastatin is advised during fusidic acid therapy (see Interactions). Periodic CPK determinations may be considered in such situations, but there is no assurance that such monitoring will prevent the occurrence of severe myopathy. Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) may cause an elevation of CPK due to the atorvastatin component (see Adverse Reactions).
There have been very rare reports of an immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) during or aftertreatment with some statins (see Adverse Reactions). IMNM is clinically characterized by persistent proximal muscle weakness and elevated serum creatine kinase, which persist despite discontinuation of statin treatment, positive anti-HMG CoA reductase antibody and improvement with immunosuppressive agents.
As with other drugs in the class of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, rare cases of rhabdomyolysis with acute renal failure secondary to myoglobinuria, have been reported. A history of renal impairment may be a risk factor for the development of rhabdomyolysis. Such patients merit closer monitoring for skeletal muscle effects. Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) therapy should be temporarily withheld or discontinued in any patient with an acute, serious condition suggestive of a myopathy or having a risk factor predisposing to the development of renal failure secondary to rhabdomyolysis (e.g., severe acute infection; hypotension; major surgery; trauma; severe metabolic, endocrine and electrolyte disorders; and uncontrolled seizures). Control of hypertension may be continued with the appropriate dose of amlodipine.
Hemorrhagic Stroke: A post-hoc analysis of a clinical study in 4,731 patients without CHD who had a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the preceding 6 months and were initiated on atorvastatin 80 mg revealed a higher incidence of hemorrhagic stroke in the atorvastatin 80 mg group compared to placebo (55 atorvastatin vs. 33 placebo). Patients with hemorrhagic stroke on entry appeared to be at increased risk for recurrent hemorrhagic stroke (7 atorvastatin vs. 2 placebo). However, in patients treated with atorvastatin 80 mg there were fewer strokes of any type (265 atorvastatin vs. 311 placebo) and fewer CHD events (123 atorvastatin vs. 204 placebo) (see Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Recurrent Stroke under Actions).
Endocrine Function: Increases in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting serum glucose levels have been reported with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, including atorvastatin. The risk of hyperglycemia, however, is outweighed by the reduction in vascular risk with statins.
Effects on Ability to Drive and Use Machines: Based on the available information on amlodipine and atorvastatin, this medication is unlikely to impair a patient's ability to drive or use machinery.
Use In Pregnancy & Lactation
Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) should be administered to women of childbearing age only when such patients are highly unlikely to conceive and have been informed of the potential hazards to the fetus.
Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) is contraindicated while breast-feeding due to the atorvastatin component. It is not known whether atorvastatin is excreted in human milk. Because of the potential for adverse reactions in nursing infants, women taking Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) should not breast-feed.
Safety of amlodipine in human pregnancy or lactation has not been established. Amlodipine did not demonstrate toxicity in animal reproductive studies other than to delay parturition and prolong labor in rats at a dose level 50 times the maximum recommended dose in humans. There was no effect on the fertility of rats treated with amlodipine (see Pharmacology: Toxicology: Preclinical Safety Data under Actions).
Experience in humans indicates that amlodipine is transferred into human breast milk. The median amlodipine concentration ratio of milk/plasma in 31 lactating women with pregnancy-induced hypertension was 0.85 following amlodipine administration at an initial dose of 5 mg once daily which was adjusted as needed (mean daily dose and body weight adjusted daily dose: 6 mg and 98.7 mcg/kg, respectively). The estimated daily dose of amlodipine in the infant via breast milk was 4.17 mcg/kg.
Adverse Reactions
In general, combination therapy with amlodipine and atorvastatin was well tolerated. For the most part, adverse events have been mild or moderate in severity. In controlled clinical trials, discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events or laboratory abnormalities was required in 5.1% of patients treated with both amlodipine and atorvastatin compared to 4.0% of patients given placebo.
The following information is based on clinical trials and postmarketing experience with amlodipine and atorvastatin.
Amlodipine Experience: Amlodipine is well tolerated. In placebo-controlled clinical trials involving patients with hypertension or angina, the most commonly observed side effects were: See Table 13.
Less commonly observed side effects in marketing experience with amlodipine include: See Table 14.
Hepatitis, jaundice and hepatic enzyme elevations have also been reported very infrequently (mostly consistent with cholestasis). Some cases severe enough to require hospitalization have been reported in association with use of amlodipine. In many instances, causal association is uncertain.
As with other calcium channel blockers, the following adverse events have been rarely reported and cannot be distinguished from the natural history of the underlying disease: MI, arrhythmia (including bradycardia, ventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation) and chest pain.
Pediatric Patients (Aged 6-17 years): Amlodipine is well tolerated in children. Adverse events were similar to those seen in adults. In a study of 268 children, the most frequently reported adverse events were: See Table 15.
Atorvastatin Experience: Atorvastatin is generally well-tolerated. Adverse reactions have usually been mild and transient. In the atorvastatin placebo-controlled clinical trial database of 16,066 (8,755 atorvastatin vs. 7,311 placebo) patients treated for a median period of 53 weeks, 5.2% of patients on atorvastatin discontinued due to adverse reactions compared to 4.0% of the patients on placebo.
The most frequent (≥1%) adverse effects that may be associated with atorvastatin therapy, reported in patients participating in placebo-controlled clinical studies include: Infections and infestations: Nasopharyngitis.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders: Hyperglycemia.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders: Pharyngolaryngeal pain, epistaxis.
Gastrointestinal disorders: Diarrhea, dyspepsia, nausea, flatulence.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders: Arthralgia, pain in extremity, musculoskeletal pain, muscle spasms, myalgia, joint swelling.
Investigations: Liver function test abnormal, blood creatine phosphokinase increased.
Additional adverse effects reported in atorvastatin placebo-controlled clinical trials include: Psychiatric disorders: Nightmare.
Eye disorders: Blurred vision.
Ear and labyrinth disorders: Tinnitus.
Gastrointestinal disorders: Abdominal discomfort, eructation.
Hepatobiliary disorders: Hepatitis, cholestasis.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders: Urticaria.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders: Muscle fatigue, neck pain.
General disorders and administration site conditions: Malaise, pyrexia.
Investigations: White blood cells positive in urine.
Not all effects listed previously have been causally associated with atorvastatin therapy.
Pediatric Patients: Patients treated with atorvastatin had an adverse experience profile generally similar to that of patients treated with placebo. The most common adverse experiences observed in both groups, regardless of causality assessment, were infections.
No clinically significant effect on growth and sexual maturation was observed in a 3-year study in children ages 6 and above based on the assessment of overall maturation and development, assessment of Tanner Stage, and measurement of height and weight. The safety and tolerability profile in pediatric patients was similar to the known safety profile of atorvastatin in adult patients.
Post-marketing Experience: In post-marketing experience, the following additional undesirable effects have been reported with atorvastatin: Blood and lymphatic system disorders: Thrombocytopenia.
Immune system disorders: Allergic reactions (including anaphylaxis).
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications: Tendon rupture.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders: Weight gain.
Nervous system disorders: Hypoesthesia, amnesia, dizziness, dysgeusia.
Gastrointestinal disorders: Pancreatitis.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders: Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, angioedema, erythema multiforme, bullous rashes.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders: Rhabdomyolysis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, myositis, back pain.
General disorders and administration site conditions: Chest pain, peripheral edema, fatigue.
Drug Interactions
No drug interaction studies have been conducted with Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) and other drugs, although studies have been conducted using the individual amlodipine and atorvastatin components, as described as follows: Amlodipine Interactions: Amlodipine has been safely administered with thiazide diuretics, alpha blockers, beta blockers, ACE inhibitors, long-acting nitrates, sublingual nitroglycerine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics, and oral hypoglycemic drugs.
CYP3A4 Inhibitors: Co-administration of a 180 mg daily dose of diltiazem with 5 mg of amlodipine in elderly hypertensive patients (69-87 years of age) resulted in a 57% increase in amlodipine systemic exposure. Erythromycin co-administration in healthy volunteers (18-43 years of age) did not significantly change amlodipine systemic exposure (22% increase in AUC). Although the clinical relevance of these findings is uncertain, the pharmacokinetic variations may be more pronounced in the elderly.
Strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 (e.g., ketoconazole, itraconazole, ritonavir) may increase the plasma concentrations of amlodipine to a greater extent than diltiazem. Amlodipine should be used with caution together with CYP3A4 inhibitors.
Clarithromycin: Clarithromycin is an inhibitor of CYP3A4. There is an increased risk of hypotension in patients receiving clarithromycin with amlodipine. Close observation of patients is recommended when amlodipine is co-administered with clarithromycin.
CYP3A4 Inducers: There are no data available regarding the effect of CYP3A4 inducers on amlodipine. The concomitant use of CYP3A4 inducers (e.g., rifampicin, Hypericum perforatum) may give a lower plasma concentration of amlodipine. Amlodipine should be used with caution together with CYP3A4 inducers.
Grapefruit Juice: Co-administration of 240 mL of grapefruit juice with a single oral dose of amlodipine 10 mg in 20 healthy volunteers had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of amlodipine. The study did not allow examination of the effect of genetic polymorphism in CYP3A4, the primary enzyme responsible for metabolism of amlodipine; therefore, administration of amlodipine with grapefruit or grapefruit juice is not recommended as bioavailability may be increased in some patients resulting in increased BP-lowering effects.
In vitro data from studies with human plasma indicate that amlodipine has no effect on protein binding of the drugs tested (digoxin, phenytoin, warfarin, or indomethacin).
In the following studies, there were no significant changes in the pharmacokinetics of either amlodipine or another drug within the study, when co-administered.
Special Studies: Effect of Other Agents on Amlodipine: Cimetidine: Co-administration of amlodipine with cimetidine did not alter the pharmacokinetics of amlodipine.
Aluminum/Magnesium (Antacid): Co-administration of an aluminum/magnesium antacid with a single dose of amlodipine had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of amlodipine.
Sildenafil: A single 100 mg dose of sildenafil in subjects with essential hypertension had no effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of amlodipine. When amlodipine and sildenafil were used in combination, each agent independently exerted its own BP-lowering effect.
Special Studies: Effect of Amlodipine on Other Agents: Digoxin: Co-administration of amlodipine with digoxin did not change serum digoxin levels or digoxin renal clearance in normal volunteers.
Ethanol (Alcohol): Single and multiple 10 mg doses of amlodipine had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of ethanol.
Warfarin: Co-administration of amlodipine with warfarin did not change the warfarin prothrombin response time.
Cyclosporine: No drug interaction studies have been conducted with cyclosporine and amlodipine in healthy volunteers or other populations with the exception of renal transplant patients. Various studies in renal transplant patients report that amlodipine co-administration with cyclosporine affect trough concentrations of cyclosporine from no change up to an average increase of 40%. Consideration should be given for monitoring cyclosporine levels in renal transplant patients on amlodipine.
Tacrolimus: There is a risk of increased tacrolimus blood levels when co-administered with amlodipine. In order to avoid toxicity of tacrolimus, administration of amlodipine in a patient treated with tacrolimus requires monitoring of tacrolimus blood levels and dose adjustment of tacrolimus when appropriate.
Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Inhibitors: mTOR inhibitors such as sirolimus, temsirolimus, and everolimus are CYP3A substrates. Amlodipine is a weak CYP3A inhibitor. With concomitant use of mTOR inhibitors, amlodipine may increase exposure of mTOR inhibitors.
Drug/Laboratory Test Interactions: None known.
Atorvastatin Interactions: The risk of myopathy during treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors is increased with concurrent administration of cyclosporine, fibric acid derivatives, lipid-modifying doses of niacin or cytochrome P450 3A4/transporter inhibitors (e.g., erythromycin and azole antifungals) (see as follows and also Use in Combination with Other Medicinal Compounds under Dosage & Administration and Skeletal Muscle Effects under Precautions).
Inhibitors of Cytochrome P450 3A4: Atorvastatin is metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4. Concomitant administration of atorvastatin with inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4 can lead to increases in plasma concentrations of atorvastatin. The extent of interaction and potentiation of effects depend on the variability of effect on cytochrome P450 3A4.
Erythromycin/Clarithromycin: Co-administration of atorvastatin and erythromycin (500 mg four times daily) or clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily), known inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4, was associated with higher plasma concentrations of atorvastatin (see Skeletal Muscle Effects under Precautions and Pharmacology: Pharmacokinetics under Actions).
Protease Inhibitors: Co-administration of atorvastatin and protease inhibitors, known inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4, was associated with increased plasma concentrations of atorvastatin (see Pharmacology: Pharmacokinetics under Actions).
Diltiazem Hydrochloride: Co-administration of atorvastatin (40 mg) with diltiazem (240 mg) was associated with higher plasma concentrations of atorvastatin (see Pharmacology: Pharmacokinetics under Actions).
Cimetidine: An atorvastatin interaction study with cimetidine was conducted, and no clinically significant interactions were seen (see Pharmacology: Pharmacokinetics under Actions).
Itraconazole: Concomitant administration of atorvastatin (20-40 mg) and itraconazole (200 mg) was associated with an increase in atorvastatin AUC (see Pharmacology: Pharmacokinetics under Actions).
Grapefruit Juice: Contains one or more components that inhibit CYP3A4 and can increase plasma concentrations of atorvastatin, especially with excessive grapefruit juice consumption (>1.2 L/day) (see Pharmacology: Pharmacokinetics under Actions).
Transporter Inhibitors: Atorvastatin is a substrate of the hepatic transporters (see Pharmacology: Pharmacokinetics under Actions).
Concomitant administration of atorvastatin 10 mg and cyclosporine 5.2 mg/kg/day resulted in an increase in exposure to atorvastatin (ratio of AUC: 8.7; see Pharmacology: Pharmacokinetics under Actions). Cyclosporine is an inhibitor of organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1), OATP1B3, multi-drug resistance protein 1 (MDR1), and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) as well as CYP3A4, thus it increases exposure to atorvastatin. Do not exceed 10 mg atorvastatin daily (see Use in Combination with Other Medicinal Compounds under Dosage & Administration).
Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir are inhibitors of OATP1B1, OATP1B3, MDR1 and BCRP, thus they increase exposure to atorvastatin. Do not exceed 10 mg atorvastatin daily (see Use in Combination with Other Medicinal Compounds under Dosage & Administration).
Concomitant administration of atorvastatin 20 mg and letermovir 480 mg daily resulted in an increase in exposure to atorvastatin (ratio of AUC: 3.29; see Pharmacology: Pharmacokinetics under Actions). Letermovir inhibits efflux transporters P-gp, BCRP, MRP2, OAT2 and hepatic transporter OATP1B1/1B3, thus it increases exposure to atorvastatin. Do not exceed 20 mg atorvastatin daily (see Use in Combination with Other Medicinal Compounds under Dosage & Administration).
The magnitude of CYP3A- and OATP1B1/1B3-mediated drug interactions on co-administered drugs may be different when letermovir is co-administered with cyclosporine. Use of atorvastatin is not recommended in patients taking letermovir co-administered with cyclosporine.
Elbasvir and grazoprevir are inhibitors of OATP1B1, OATP1B3, MDR1 and BCRP, thus they increase exposure to atorvastatin. Use with caution and lowest dose necessary (see Use in Combination with Other Medicinal Compounds under Dosage & Administration).
Inducers of Cytochrome P450 3A4: Concomitant administration of atorvastatin with inducers of cytochrome P450 3A4 (e.g., efavirenz, rifampin) can lead to variable reductions in plasma concentrations of atorvastatin. Due to the dual interaction mechanism of rifampin (cytochrome P450 3A4 induction and inhibition of hepatocyte uptake transporter OATP1B1), simultaneous co-administration of atorvastatin with rifampin is recommended, as delayed administration of atorvastatin after administration of rifampin has been associated with a significant reduction in atorvastatin plasma concentrations (see Pharmacology: Pharmacokinetics under Actions).
Antacids: Co-administration of atorvastatin with an oral antacid suspension containing magnesium and aluminum hydroxides decreased atorvastatin plasma concentrations (ratio of AUC: 0.66); however, LDL-C reduction was not altered.
Antipyrine: Because atorvastatin does not affect the pharmacokinetics of antipyrine, interactions with other drugs metabolized via the same cytochrome isozymes are not expected.
Colestipol: Plasma concentrations of atorvastatin were lower (ratio of concentration: 0.74) when colestipol was administered with atorvastatin. However, lipid effects were greater when atorvastatin and colestipol were co-administered than when either drug was given alone.
Digoxin: When multiple doses of digoxin and 10 mg of atorvastatin were co-administered, steady-state plasma digoxin concentrations were unaffected. However, digoxin concentrations increased (ratio of AUC: 1.15) following administration of digoxin with 80 mg of atorvastatin daily. Patients taking digoxin should be monitored appropriately.
Azithromycin: Co-administration of atorvastatin (10 mg once daily) and azithromycin (500 mg once daily) did not alter the plasma concentrations of atorvastatin.
Oral Contraceptives: Co-administration of atorvastatin with an oral contraceptive containing norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol increased the area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) values for norethindrone (ratio of AUC: 1.28) and ethinyl estradiol (ratio of AUC: 1.19), respectively. These increases should be considered when selecting an oral contraceptive for a woman taking atorvastatin.
Warfarin: An atorvastatin interaction study with warfarin was conducted, and no clinically significant interactions were observed.
Fusidic Acid: Although interaction studies with atorvastatin and fusidic acid have not been conducted, there is an increased risk of rhabdomyolysis in patients receiving a combination of statins, including atorvastatin, and fusidic acid. The mechanism of this interaction is not known. In patients where the use of systemic fusidic acid is considered essential, statin treatment should be discontinued throughout the duration of fusidic acid treatment. Statin therapy may be re-introduced seven days after the last dose of fusidic acid.
In exceptional circumstances, where prolonged systemic fusidic acid is needed, e.g., for the treatment of severe infections, the need for co-administration of atorvastatin and fusidic acid should only be considered on a case by case basis and under close medical supervision. The patient should be advised to seek medical advice immediately if they experience any symptoms of muscle weakness, pain or tenderness.
Colchicine: Although interaction studies with atorvastatin and colchicine have not been conducted, cases of myopathy have been reported with atorvastatin co-administered with colchicine, and caution should be exercised when prescribing atorvastatin with colchicine.
Other Concomitant Therapy: In clinical studies, atorvastatin was used concomitantly with antihypertensive agents and estrogen replacement therapy without evidence of clinically significant adverse interactions. Interaction studies with specific agents have not been conducted.
Storage
Action
Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Mechanism of Action: Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) combines two mechanisms of action: the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist (calcium ion antagonist or slow-channel blocker) action of amlodipine and the HMG-CoA reductase inhibition of atorvastatin. The amlodipine component of amlodipine/atorvastatin inhibits the transmembrane influx of calcium ions into vascular smooth muscle and cardiac muscle. The atorvastatin component of amlodipine/atorvastatin is a selective, competitive inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme that converts HMG-CoA to mevalonate, a precursor of sterols, including cholesterol.
Clinical Studies of Combined Amlodipine and Atorvastatin in Patients with Hypertension and Dyslipidemia: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 1,660 patients with comorbid hypertension and dyslipidemia, once-daily treatment with eight dose combinations of amlodipine and atorvastatin (5/10 mg, 10/10 mg, 5/20 mg, 10/20 mg, 5/40 mg, 10/40 mg, 5/80 mg, or 10/80 mg) was compared vs. amlodipine alone (5 mg or 10 mg), atorvastatin alone (10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg), and placebo. In addition to concomitant hypertension and dyslipidemia, 15% of the patients had diabetes mellitus, 22% were smokers and 14% had a positive family history of CVD. At 8 weeks, all eight combination-treatment groups demonstrated statistically significant dose-related reductions in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and LDL-C compared to placebo, with no overall modification of effect of either component on SBP, DBP and LDL-C (see table as follows).
Efficacy in Terms of Reduction in Blood Pressure and LDL-C: See Tables 1, 2 and 3.
Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial: The Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) is a randomized 2x2 factorial design study comparing two antihypertensive regimens in a total of 19,342 patients (Blood Pressure Lowering arm - ASCOT-BPLA), as well as the effect of addition of 10 mg atorvastatin compared to placebo in 10,305 patients (Lipid-Lowering arm - ASCOT-LLA) on fatal and non-fatal coronary events. There are 19,257 and 10,240 efficacy evaluable patients in ASCOT-BPLA and ASCOT-LLA, respectively.
In Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial Blood Pressure Lowering Arm: The effect of treatment regimens based on amlodipine (5 mg-10 mg) (n = 9681) or atenolol (50 mg-100 mg) (n = 9661) was compared in a prospective randomized open blinded endpoint (PROBE) design in 19,342 hypertensive patients, ≥40 to <80 years of age with no previous MI or treatment for angina, at least three of the following predefined cardiovascular risk factors: male gender, age ≥55 years, smoking, Type 2 diabetes, history of CAD event occurring in a first-degree relative before the age of 55 years (males) or 60 years (females), total-C: HDL ≥6, peripheral vascular disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, prior cerebrovascular event, specific electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities, proteinuria/albuminuria.
To attain further BP goals (<140/90 mm Hg for non-diabetic patients, <130/80 mm Hg for diabetic patients), perindopril (4 mg-8 mg) could be added to the amlodipine group and bendroflumethiazide potassium (1.25 mg-2.5 mg) to the atenolol group. Third line therapy was doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) (4 mg-8 mg) in both arms.
The ASCOT-BPLA study was stopped prematurely after 903 primary events (non-fatal MI and fatal CHD) with median follow-up of 5.5 years due to significant benefit of the amlodipine based regimen on the following secondary endpoints: all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality and stroke. The study had planned to need at least 1,150 primary endpoints.
The primary endpoint of non-fatal MI + fatal CHD did not reach statistical significance when comparing the amlodipine-based group to the atenolol-based group. The secondary endpoints of total coronary events, all-cause mortality, fatal and non-fatal stroke were statistically significantly reduced when comparing amlodipine-based group to the atenolol-based group.
The incidence of the primary and secondary endpoints in the 19,257 efficacy evaluable patients: See Table 4.
In Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial Lipid-Lowering Arm: In the ASCOT-LLA, the effect of atorvastatin on fatal and non-fatal CHD was assessed in 10,305 hypertensive patients 40 to 80 years of age (mean of 63 years), without a previous MI and with TC levels <6.5 mmol/L (251 mg/dL). Additionally all patients had at least three of the following cardiovascular risk factors: male gender, age >55 years, smoking, diabetes, history of CHD in a first-degree relative, TC:HDL >6, peripheral vascular disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, prior cerebrovascular event, specific ECG abnormality, proteinuria/albuminuria. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study patients were treated with antihypertensive therapy (goal BP <140/90 mmHg for non-diabetic patients, <130/80 mmHg for diabetic patients) and allocated to either atorvastatin 10 mg daily (n = 5168) or placebo (n = 5137). As the effect of atorvastatin treatment compared to placebo exceeded the significance threshold during an interim analysis, the ASCOT-LLA was terminated early at 3.3 years instead of 5 years. Additionally, BP was well controlled and similar in patients assigned to atorvastatin and placebo. These changes persisted throughout the treatment period.
Atorvastatin reduced the rate of the following events: See Table 5.
In Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial 2x2: The pre-specified ASCOT 2x2 factorial analysis investigated the potential differential effect (interaction) of adding atorvastatin to the amlodipine vs. the atenolol group in ASCOT-LLA.
For the 10,305 patients enrolled in ASCOT-LLA, there were 5,168 patients in the atorvastatin group (2,584 patients received amlodipine and 2,584 patients received atenolol) and 5,137 in the placebo group (2,554 patients received amlodipine and 2,583 patients received atenolol).
The risk reductions on the composite endpoint of non-fatal MI and fatal CHD were based on the 10,240 efficacy evaluable patients.
The combination of amlodipine with atorvastatin resulted in a significant risk reduction in the composite primary endpoint of fatal CHD and non-fatal MI by: 53% (95% CI 31%-68%, p <0.0001) compared to amlodipine + placebo, 39% (95% CI 8%-59%, p <0.016) compared to atenolol + atorvastatin.
The p-value for the interaction was 0.027 which was not statistically significant at the pre-specified 0.01 level.
Blood pressure (SBP/DBP) decreased significantly on all four treatment regimens when compared to baseline (p-values <0.001). The SBP/DBP decreases from baseline were significantly more with the amlodipine based regimens than with the atenolol based regimens (-26.5/-15.6 mmHg vs. - 24.7/- 13.6 mmHg for amlodipine/atorvastatin vs. atenolol/atorvastatin, and -27.1/-15.8 mmHg vs. - 24.1/- 13.6 mmHg for amlodipine/placebo vs. atenolol/placebo, respectively). The p-values on differences between the two groups were all <0.01 for SBP and DBP.
Amlodipine Pharmacodynamics: Amlodipine is a calcium ion influx inhibitor (slow channel blocker or calcium ion antagonist) and inhibits the transmembrane influx of calcium ions into cardiac and vascular smooth muscle.
The mechanism of the antihypertensive action of amlodipine is due to a direct relaxant effect on vascular smooth muscle. The precise mechanism by which amlodipine relieves angina has not been fully determined but amlodipine reduces total ischemic burden by the following two actions.
Amlodipine dilates peripheral arterioles and thus, reduces the total peripheral resistance (afterload) against which the heart works. Since the heart rate remains stable, this unloading of the heart reduces myocardial energy consumption and oxygen requirements.
The mechanism of action of amlodipine also probably involves dilatation of the main coronary arteries and coronary arterioles, both in normal and ischemic regions. This dilatation increases myocardial oxygen delivery in patients with coronary artery spasm (Prinzmetal's or variant angina) and blunts smoking-induced coronary vasoconstriction.
In patients with hypertension, once daily dosing provides clinically significant reductions of BP in both the supine and standing positions throughout the 24 hour interval. Due to the slow onset of action, acute hypotension is not a feature of amlodipine administration.
In patients with angina, once daily administration of amlodipine increases total exercise time, time to angina onset, and time to 1 mm ST segment depression, and decreases both angina attack frequency and nitroglycerine tablet consumption.
Amlodipine has not been associated with any adverse metabolic effects or changes in plasma lipids and is suitable for use in patients with asthma, diabetes, and gout.
Use in Patients with CAD: The effects of amlodipine on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, the progression of coronary atherosclerosis, and carotid atherosclerosis were studied in the Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of NORVASC Trial (PREVENT). This multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study followed 825 patients with angiographically defined CAD for 3 years. The population included patients with previous MI (45%), percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) at baseline (42%), or history of angina (69%). Severity of CAD ranged from 1-vessel disease (45% of patients) to 3+ vessel disease (21% of patients). Patients with uncontrolled hypertension (DBP > 95 mm Hg) were excluded from the study. Major cardiovascular events (MCVE) were adjudicated by a blinded endpoint committee. Although there were no demonstrable effects on the rate of progression of coronary artery lesions, amlodipine arrested the progression of carotid intima-media thickening. A significant reduction (- 31%) was observed in the amlodipine-treated patients in the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, PTCA, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), hospitalization for unstable angina, and worsening CHF. A significant reduction (-42%) in revascularization procedures (PTCA and CABG) was also seen in the amlodipine-treated patients. Fewer hospitalizations (-33%) were seen for unstable angina in amlodipine-treated patients than in the placebo group.
The effectiveness of amlodipine in preventing clinical events in patients with CAD has been evaluated in an independent, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 1,997 patients; Comparison of Amlodipine vs. Enalapril to Limit Occurrences of Thrombosis (CAMELOT). Of these, 663 were treated with amlodipine 5 mg to 10 mg and 655 patients were treated with placebo, in addition to standard care of statins, beta-blockers, diuretics and aspirin, for 2 years. The key efficacy results are presented in Table 6. The results indicate that amlodipine treatment was associated with fewer hospitalizations for angina and revascularization procedures in patients with CAD. (See Table 6.)
A total of 33,357 hypertensive patients aged 55 or older were randomized and followed for a mean of 4.9 years. The patients had at least one additional CHD risk factor, including MI or stroke >6 months or documentation of other atherosclerotic CVD (overall 51.5%), type 2 diabetes (36.1%), HDL-C <35 mg/dL (11.6%), left ventricular hypertrophy diagnosed by electrocardiogram or echocardiography (20.9%), current cigarette smoking (21.9%).
The primary endpoint was a composite of fatal CHD or non-fatal MI. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint between amlodipine-based therapy and chlorthalidone-based therapy: RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.90-1.07; p = 0.65. In addition, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between amlodipine-based therapy and chlorthalidone-based therapy: RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.89-1.02; p = 0.20.
Use in Patients with Heart Failure: Hemodynamic studies and exercise based controlled clinical trials in NYHA Class II-IV heart failure patients have shown that amlodipine did not lead to clinical deterioration as measured by exercise tolerance, left ventricular ejection fraction and clinical symptomatology.
A placebo-controlled study (PRAISE) designed to evaluate patients in NYHA Class III-IV heart failure receiving digoxin, diuretics and ACE inhibitors has shown that amlodipine did not lead to an increase in risk of mortality or combined mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure.
In a follow-up, long-term, placebo controlled study (PRAISE-2) of amlodipine in patients with NYHA III - IV heart failure without clinical symptoms or objective findings suggestive of underlying ischemic disease, on stable doses of ACE inhibitors, digitalis, and diuretics, amlodipine had no effect on total or cardiovascular mortality. In this same population amlodipine was associated with increased reports of pulmonary edema despite no significant difference in the incidence of worsening heart failure as compared to placebo.
Use in Pediatric Patients (Aged 6 to 17 years): The efficacy of amlodipine in hypertensive pediatric patients 6 to 17 years of age was demonstrated in one 8-week double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized withdrawal trial in 268 patients with hypertension. All patients were randomized to the 2.5 mg or 5 mg treatment arms and followed for 4 weeks after which they were randomized to continue 2.5 mg or 5 mg amlodipine or placebo for an additional 4 weeks. Compared to baseline, once daily treatment with amlodipine 5 mg resulted in statistically significant reductions in SBP and DBP. Placebo-adjusted, mean reduction in seated SBP was estimated to be 5.0 mmHg for the 5 mg dose of amlodipine and 3.3 mmHg for the 2.5 mg dose of amlodipine. Subgroup analyses indicated that younger pediatric patients aged 6 to 13 years had efficacy results comparable to those of the older pediatric patients aged 14 to 17 years.
Atorvastatin Pharmacodynamics: Atorvastatin is a selective, competitive inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme that converts HMG-CoA to mevalonate, a precursor of sterols, including cholesterol. In patients with homozygous and heterozygous FH, nonfamilial forms of hypercholesterolemia, and mixed dyslipidemia, atorvastatin reduces total-C, LDL-C, and apo B. Atorvastatin also reduces very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) and TG and produces variable increases in HDL-C.
Atorvastatin lowers plasma cholesterol and lipoprotein levels by inhibiting HMG-CoA reductase and cholesterol synthesis in the liver and by increasing the number of hepatic LDL receptors on the cell surface for enhanced uptake and catabolism of LDL.
Atorvastatin reduces LDL production and the number of LDL particles. Atorvastatin produces a profound and sustained increase in LDL receptor activity coupled with a beneficial change in the quality of circulating LDL particles. Atorvastatin is effective in reducing LDL in patients with homozygous FH, a population that has not normally responded to lipid-lowering medication.
Atorvastatin and some of its metabolites are pharmacologically active in humans. The primary site of action of atorvastatin is the liver, which is the principal site of cholesterol synthesis and LDL clearance. LDL-C reduction correlates better with drug dose than it does with systemic drug concentration. Individualization of drug dosage should be based on therapeutic response (see Dosage & Administration).
In a dose-response study, atorvastatin (10-80 mg) reduced total-C (30%-46%), LDL-C (41%-61%), apo B (34%-50%), and TG (14%-33%). These results are consistent in patients with heterozygous FH, nonfamilial forms of hypercholesterolemia, and mixed hyperlipidemia, including patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
In patients with isolated hypertriglyceridemia, atorvastatin reduces total-C, LDL-C, VLDL-C, apo B, TG, and non-HDL-C, and increases HDL-C. In patients with dysbetalipoproteinemia, atorvastatin reduces intermediate density lipoprotein cholesterol (IDL-C).
In patients with Fredrickson Types IIa and IIb hyperlipoproteinemia pooled from 24 controlled trials, the median percent increases from baseline in HDL-C for atorvastatin (10-80 mg) were 5.1% to 8.7% in a non-dose-related manner. Additionally, analysis of this pooled data demonstrated significant dose related decreases in total-C/HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C ratios, ranging from -29% to -44% and -37% to -55%, respectively.
The effects of atorvastatin on ischemic events and total mortality were studied in the Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering study (MIRACL). This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study followed 3,086 patients with acute coronary syndromes; unstable angina or non-Q wave MI. Patients were treated with standard care, including diet, and either atorvastatin 80 mg daily or placebo for a median duration of 16 weeks. The final LDL-C, total-C, HDL-C and TG levels were 72 mg/dL, 147 mg/dL, 48 mg/dL, and 139 mg/dL in the atorvastatin group, respectively, and 135 mg/dL, 217 mg/dL, 46 mg/dL, and 187 mg/dL, respectively, in the placebo group. Atorvastatin significantly reduced the risk of ischemic events and death by 16%. The risk of experiencing re-hospitalization for angina pectoris with documented evidence of myocardial ischemia was significantly reduced by 26%. Atorvastatin reduced the risk of ischemic events and death to a similar extent across the range of baseline LDL-C. In addition, atorvastatin reduced the risk of ischemic events and death to similar extents in patients with non-Q wave MI and unstable angina, as well as in males and females and in patients ≤65 years of age and >65 years of age.
Prevention of Cardiovascular Complications: The effect of atorvastatin on fatal and non-fatal CHD is discussed in this section under Clinical Studies of Combined Amlodipine and Atorvastatin in Patients with Hypertension and Dyslipidemia, Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial.
In the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS), the effect of atorvastatin on fatal and non-fatal CVD was assessed in 2838 patients with Type 2 diabetes 40 to 75 years of age, without prior history of CVD and with LDL ≤4.14 mmol/L (160 mg/dL) and TG ≤6.78 mmol/L (600 mg/dL). Additionally, all patients had at least one of the following risk factors: hypertension, current smoking, retinopathy, microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria.
In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial, patients were treated with either atorvastatin 10 mg daily (n = 1428) or placebo (n = 1410) for a median follow-up of 3.9 years. As the effect of atorvastatin treatment on the primary endpoint reached the predefined stopping rules for efficacy, CARDS was terminated 2 years earlier than anticipated.
The absolute and relative risk reduction effect of atorvastatin is as follows: See Table 7.
A relative risk reduction in death of 27% (82 deaths in the placebo group compared to 61 deaths in the treatment arm) has been observed with a borderline statistical significance (p = 0.0592).
The overall incidence of adverse events or serious adverse events was similar between the treatment groups.
Atherosclerosis: In the Reversing Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid-Lowering Study (REVERSAL), the effect of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg on coronary atherosclerosis was assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), during angiography, in patients with CHD. In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled clinical trial, IVUS was performed at baseline and at 18 months in 502 patients. In the atorvastatin group (n = 253), the median percent change, from baseline, in total atheroma volume (the primary study criteria) was -0.4% (p = 0.98) in the atorvastatin group and +2.7% (p = 0.001) in the pravastatin group (n = 249). When compared to pravastatin, the effects of atorvastatin were statistically significant (p = 0.02).
In the atorvastatin group, LDL-C was reduced to a mean of 2.04 mmol/L ± 0.8 (78.9 mg/dL ± 30) from baseline 3.89 mmol/L ± 0.7 (150 mg/dL ± 28) and in the pravastatin group, LDL-C was reduced to a mean of 2.85 mmol/L ± 0.7 (110 mg/dL ± 26) from baseline 3.89 mmol/L ± 0.7 (150 mg/dL ± 26) (p<0.0001). Atorvastatin also significantly reduced mean TC by 34.1% (pravastatin: -18.4%, p<0.0001), mean TG levels by 20% (pravastatin: -6.8%, p<0.0009), and mean apo B by 39.1% (pravastatin: -22.0%, p<0.0001). Atorvastatin increased mean HDL-C by 2.9% (pravastatin: +5.6%, p = NS). There was a 36.4% mean reduction in CRP in the atorvastatin group compared to a 5.2% reduction in the pravastatin group (p<0.0001).
The safety and tolerability profiles of the two treatment groups were comparable.
Recurrent Stroke: In the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) study, the effect of atorvastatin 80 mg daily or placebo on stroke was evaluated in 4,731 patients who had a stroke or TIA within the preceding 6 months and no history of CHD. Patients were 60% male, 21 to 92 years of age (average age 63 years), and had an average baseline LDL of 133 mg/dL (3.4 mmol/L). The mean LDL-C was 73 mg/dL (1.9 mmol/L) during treatment with atorvastatin and 129 mg/dL (3.3 mmol/L) during treatment with placebo. Median follow-up was 4.9 years.
Atorvastatin 80 mg reduced the risk of the primary endpoint of fatal or non-fatal stroke by 15% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85; 95% CI 0.72-1.00; p = 0.05 or HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.71-0.99; p = 0.03 after adjustment for baseline factors) compared to placebo. Atorvastatin 80 mg significantly reduced the risk of major coronary events (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.51-0.89; p = 0.006), any CHD event (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.48-0.74; p<0.001), and revascularization procedures (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.44-0.74; p<0.001).
In a post-hoc analysis, atorvastatin 80 mg, reduced the incidence of ischemic stroke (218/2365, 9.2% vs. 274/2366, 11.6%, p = 0.01) and increased the incidence of hemorrhagic stroke (55/2365, 2.3% vs. 33/2366, 1.4%, p = 0.02) compared to placebo. The incidence of fatal hemorrhagic stroke was similar between the groups (17 atorvastatin vs. 18 placebo). Reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events with atorvastatin 80 mg was demonstrated in all patient groups except in patients who entered the study with a hemorrhagic stroke and had a recurrent hemorrhagic stroke (7 atorvastatin vs. 2 placebo), where the number of events was too small to discern risk or benefit.
In patients treated with atorvastatin 80 mg, there were fewer strokes of any type (265 atorvastatin vs. 311 placebo) and fewer CHD events (123 atorvastatin vs. 204 placebo). Overall mortality was similar across treatment groups (216 atorvastatin vs. 211 placebo). The overall incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events was similar between the treatment groups.
Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events: In the Treating to New Targets Study (TNT), the effect of atorvastatin 80 mg/day vs. atorvastatin 10 mg/day on the reduction in cardiovascular events was assessed in 10,001 subjects (94% white, 81% male, 38% ≥65 years) with clinically evident CHD who had achieved a target LDL-C level <130 mg/dL after completing an 8-week, open-label, run-in period with atorvastatin 10 mg/day. Subjects were randomly assigned to either 10 mg/day or 80 mg/day of atorvastatin and followed for a median duration of 4.9 years. The mean LDL-C, TC, TG, non-HDL and HDL cholesterol levels at 12 weeks were 73 mg/dL, 145 mg/dL, 128 mg/dL, 98 mg/dL and 47 mg/dL, respectively, during treatment with 80 mg of atorvastatin and 99 mg/dL, 177 mg/dL, 152 mg/dL, 129 mg/dL and 48 mg/dL, respectively, during treatment with 10 mg of atorvastatin.
Treatment with atorvastatin 80 mg/day significantly reduced the rate of MCVE (434 events in the 80 mg/day group vs. 548 events in the 10 mg/day group) with a relative risk reduction of 22%.
Atorvastatin 80 mg significantly reduced the risk of the following: See Table 8.
In the Incremental Decrease in Endpoints Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering Study (IDEAL), treatment with atorvastatin 80 mg/day was compared to treatment with simvastatin 20 mg/day to 40 mg/day in 8,888 subjects up to 80 years of age with a history of CHD to assess whether reduction in CV risk could be achieved. Patients were mainly male (81%), white (99%) with an average age of 61.7 years and an average LDL-C of 121.5 mg/dL at randomization; 76% were on statin therapy. In this prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) trial with no run-in period, subjects were followed for a median duration of 4.8 years. The mean LDL-C, TC, TG, HDL and non-HDL cholesterol levels at Week 12 were 78 mg/dL, 145 mg/dL, 115 mg/dL, 45 mg/dL and 100 mg/dL, respectively, during treatment with 80 mg of atorvastatin and 105 mg/dL, 179 mg/dL, 142 mg/dL, 47 mg/dL and 132 mg/dL, respectively, during treatment with 20 mg to 40 mg of simvastatin.
There was no significant difference between the treatment groups for the primary endpoint, the rate of first major coronary event (fatal CHD, non-fatal MI and resuscitated cardiac arrest): 411 (9.3%) in the atorvastatin 80 mg/day group vs. 463 (10.4%) in the simvastatin 20 mg to 40 mg/day group, HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.78, 1.01; p = 0.07.
There were no significant differences between the treatment groups for all-cause mortality: 366 (8.2%) in the atorvastatin 80 mg/day group vs. 374 (8.4%) in the simvastatin 20 mg to 40 mg/day group. The proportions of subjects who experienced CV or non-CV death were similar for the atorvastatin 80 mg group and the simvastatin 20 mg to 40 mg group.
Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Pediatric Patients: The following pediatric-exclusive studies have been completed with atorvastatin.
In an open-label, single-arm study, 271 male and female Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) children 6-15 years of age were enrolled and treated with atorvastatin for up to 3 years. Inclusion in the study required confirmed HeFH and a baseline LDL-C level ≥4 mmol/L (approximately 152 mg/dL). The study included 139 children at Tanner 1 development stage (generally ranging from 6-10 years of age). The dosage of atorvastatin (once daily) was initiated at 5 mg (chewable tablet) in children less than 10 years of age. Children age 10 and above were initiated at 10 mg atorvastatin (once daily). All children could titrate to higher doses to achieve a target of <3.35 mmol/L LDL-C. The mean weighted dose for children aged 6 to 9 years was 19.6 mg and the mean weighted dose for children aged 10 years and above was 23.9 mg.
The mean (± SD) baseline LDL-C value was 6.12 (1.26) mmol/L which was approximately 233 (48) mg/dL. See Table 9 as follows for final results.
The data were consistent with no drug effect on any of the parameters of growth and development (i.e., height, weight, BMI, Tanner stage, Investigator assessment of Overall Maturation and Development) in pediatric and adolescent subjects with HeFH receiving atorvastatin treatment over the 3 year study. There was no Investigator-assessed drug effect noted in height, weight, BMI by age or by gender by visit. (See Table 9.)
Atorvastatin significantly decreased plasma levels of total-C, LDL-C, TG, and apo B during the 26 week double-blind phase (see Table 10).
An 8-week, open-label study to evaluate pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety and tolerability of atorvastatin was conducted in 39 patients, 6 to 17 years of age with genetically confirmed heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and baseline LDL-C ≥4 mmol/L. Cohort A included 15 patients, 6 to 12 years of age and at Tanner Stage 1. Cohort B included 24 patients, 10 to 17 years of age and at Tanner Stage ≥2.
The initial dose of atorvastatin was 5 mg daily of a chewable tablet in Cohort A and 10 mg daily of a tablet formulation in Cohort B. The atorvastatin dose was permitted to be doubled if a patient had not attained target LDL-C of <3.35 mmol/L at Week 4 and if atorvastatin was well tolerated.
Mean values for LDL-C, TC, VLDL-C, and Apo B decreased by Week 2 among all patients. For patients whose dose was doubled, additional decreases were observed as early as 2 weeks, at the first assessment, after dose escalation. The mean percent decreases in lipid parameters were similar for both cohorts, regardless of whether patients remained at their initial dose or doubled their initial dose. At Week 8, on average, the percent change from baseline in LDL-C and TC was approximately 40% and 30%, respectively, over the range of exposures.
The long-term efficacy of atorvastatin therapy in childhood to reduce morbidity and mortality in adulthood has not been established.
Pharmacokinetics: Absorption: In studies with amlodipine/atorvastatin: Following oral administration of Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) two distinct peak plasma concentrations were observed. The first, within 1 to 2 hours of administration, is attributable to atorvastatin; the second, between 6 and 12 hours after dosing is attributable to amlodipine. The rate and extent of absorption (bioavailability) of amlodipine and atorvastatin from Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) are not significantly different from the bioavailability of amlodipine and atorvastatin from co-administration of amlodipine and atorvastatin tablets as assessed by Cmax: 101% (90% CI: 98, 104) and AUC: 100% (90% CI: 97, 103) for the amlodipine component and Cmax: 94% (90% CI: 85, 104) and AUC: 105% (90% CI: 99, 111) for the atorvastatin component, respectively.
The bioavailability of the amlodipine component of Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) was not affected under the fed state as assessed by Cmax: 105% (90% CI: 99, 111) and AUC: 101% (90% CI: 97, 105) relative to the fasted state. Although food decreases the rate and extent of absorption of atorvastatin from Amlodipine besilate/Atorvastatin calcium (Norvasc Protect) by approximately 32% and 11%, respectively, as assessed by Cmax: 68% (90% CI 60, 79) and AUC: 89% (90% CI 83, 95) relative to the fasted state, similar reductions in plasma concentrations in the fed state have been seen with atorvastatin taken as monotherapy without reduction in LDL-C effect (see as follows).
In studies with amlodipine: After oral administration of therapeutic doses, amlodipine is well absorbed with peak blood levels between 6 to 12 hours post-dose. Absolute bioavailability has been estimated to be between 64% and 80%. The volume of distribution is approximately 21 L/kg. In vitro studies have shown that approximately 97.5% of circulating amlodipine is bound to plasma proteins.
Absorption of amlodipine is unaffected by consumption of food.
In studies with atorvastatin: Atorvastatin is rapidly absorbed after oral administration; maximum plasma concentrations occur within 1 to 2 hours. Extent of absorption and plasma atorvastatin concentrations increases in proportion to atorvastatin dose. Atorvastatin tablets are 95% to 99% bioavailable compared to solutions. The absolute bioavailability of atorvastatin is approximately 14% and the systemic availability of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity is approximately 30%. The low systemic availability is attributed to presystemic clearance in gastrointestinal mucosa and/or hepatic first-pass metabolism. Although food decreases the rate and extent of drug absorption by approximately 25% and 9% respectively, as assessed by Cmax and AUC, LDL-C reduction is similar whether atorvastatin is given with or without food. Plasma atorvastatin concentrations are lower (approximately 30% for Cmax and AUC) following evening drug administration compared to morning. However, LDL-C reduction is the same regardless of the time of day of drug administration (see Dosage & Administration).
Distribution: In studies with atorvastatin: Mean volume of distribution of atorvastatin is approximately 381 L. Atorvastatin is ≥98% bound to plasma proteins. A red blood cell/plasma ratio of approximately 0.25 indicates poor drug penetration into red blood cells.
Metabolism and Excretion: In studies with amlodipine: The terminal plasma elimination half life is about 35 to 50 hours and is consistent with once daily dosing. Steady-state plasma levels are reached after 7 to 8 days of consecutive dosing. Amlodipine is extensively metabolized by the liver to inactive metabolites with 10% of the parent compound and 60% of metabolites excreted in the urine.
In studies with atorvastatin: Atorvastatin is extensively metabolized to ortho- and para-hydroxylated derivatives and various beta-oxidation products. In vitro inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase by ortho- and para-hydroxylated metabolites is equivalent to that of atorvastatin. Approximately 70% of circulating inhibitory activity for HMG-CoA reductase is attributed to active metabolites. In vitro studies suggest the importance of atorvastatin metabolism by hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4, consistent with increased plasma concentrations of atorvastatin in humans following co-administration with erythromycin, a known inhibitor of this isozyme. In vitro studies also indicate that atorvastatin is a weak inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4. Atorvastatin co-administration did not produce a clinically significant effect in plasma concentrations of terfenadine, a compound predominantly metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4; therefore, it is unlikely that atorvastatin will significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of other cytochrome P450 3A4 substrates (see Interactions). In animals, the ortho-hydroxy metabolite undergoes further glucuronidation.
Atorvastatin and its metabolites are eliminated primarily in bile following hepatic and/or extrahepatic metabolism; however, the drug does not appear to undergo enterohepatic recirculation. Mean plasma elimination half-life of atorvastatin in humans is approximately 14 hours, but the half-life of inhibitory activity for HMG-CoA reductase is 20 to 30 hours due to the contribution of active metabolites. Less than 2% of a dose of atorvastatin is recovered in urine following oral administration.
Atorvastatin is a substrate of the hepatic transporters, OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 transporter. Metabolites of atorvastatin are substrates of OATP1B1. Atorvastatin is also identified as a substrate of the efflux transporters MDR1 and BCRP, which may limit the intestinal absorption and biliary clearance of atorvastatin.
Special Populations: Hepatic Insufficiency: In studies with atorvastatin: Plasma concentrations of atorvastatin are markedly increased (approximately 16-fold in Cmax and 11-fold in AUC) in patients with chronic alcoholic liver disease (Child-Pugh B) (see Contraindications).
Renal Insufficiency: See Dosage & Administration.
In studies with amlodipine: Changes in amlodipine plasma concentrations are not correlated with degree of renal impairment. Amlodipine is not dialyzable.
In studies with atorvastatin: Renal disease has no influence on the plasma concentrations or lipid effects of atorvastatin. Thus, dose adjustment in patients with renal dysfunction is not necessary.
Gender: In studies with atorvastatin: Plasma concentrations of atorvastatin in women differ (approximately 20% higher for Cmax and 10% lower for AUC) from those in men. However, there were no clinically significant differences in lipid effects between men and women.
Elderly: In studies with amlodipine: The time to reach peak plasma concentrations of amlodipine is similar in elderly and younger subjects. Amlodipine clearance tends to be decreased with resulting increases in AUC and elimination half-life in elderly patients. Increases in AUC and elimination half life in patients with CHF were as expected for the patient age group studied. Amlodipine, used at similar doses in elderly or younger patients, is equally well tolerated.
In studies with atorvastatin: Plasma concentrations of atorvastatin are higher (approximately 40% for Cmax and 30% for AUC) in healthy, elderly subjects (aged ≥65 years) than in young adults. The ACCESS study specifically evaluated elderly patients with respect to reaching their NCEP treatment goals. The study included 1,087 patients under 65 years of age, 815 patients over 65 years of age, and 185 patients over 75 years of age. No differences in safety, efficacy or lipid treatment goal attainment were observed between elderly patients and the overall population.
Pediatrics: In studies with amlodipine: In one clinical chronic exposure study, 73 hypertensive pediatric patients, aged 12 months to less than or equal to 17 years, amlodipine besilate was dosed at an average daily dose of 0.17 mg/kg. Clearance for subjects with the median weight of 45 kg was 23.7 L/h and 17.6 L/h for males and females, respectively. This is in a similar range to the published estimates of 24.8 L/h in a 70 kg adult. The average estimate for volume of distribution for a 45 kg patient was 1130 L (25.11 L/kg). Maintenance of the BP effect over the 24-hour dosing interval was observed with little difference in peak and trough variation effect. When compared to historical adult pharmacokinetics the parameters observed in this study indicate that once daily dosing is appropriate.
In studies with atorvastatin: In an open-label, 8-week study, Tanner Stage 1 (N = 15) and Tanner Stage ≥2 (N = 24) pediatric patients (ages 6-17 years) with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and baseline LDL-C ≥4 mmol/L were treated with 5 or 10 mg of chewable or 10 or 20 mg of film-coated atorvastatin tablets once daily, respectively. Body weight was the only significant covariate in atorvastatin population PK model. Apparent oral clearance of atorvastatin in pediatric subjects appeared similar to adults when scaled allometrically by body weight. Consistent decreases in LDL-C and TC were observed over the range of atorvastatin and o-hydroxyatorvastatin exposures.
Drug Interactions: In studies with atorvastatin: The effect of co-administered drugs on the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin as well as the effect of atorvastatin on the pharmacokinetics of co-administered drugs are summarized as follows (see Precautions and Interactions). (See Tables 11 and 12.)
Toxicology: Preclinical Safety Data: Carcinogenesis: In studies with amlodipine: Rats and mice treated with amlodipine in the diet for 2 years, at concentrations calculated to provide daily dosage levels of 0.5, 1.25, and 2.5 mg/kg/day showed no evidence of carcinogenicity. The highest dose (for mice, similar to, and for rats twice* the maximum recommended clinical dose of 10 mg on a mg/m2 basis) was close to the maximum tolerated dose for mice but not for rats.
In studies with atorvastatin: Atorvastatin was not carcinogenic in rats. The maximum dose used was 63-fold higher than the highest human dose (80 mg/day) on a mg/kg body-weight basis and 8- to 16-fold higher based on AUC(0-24) values. In a 2-year study in mice, incidences of hepatocellular adenomas in males and hepatocellular carcinomas in females were increased at the maximum dose used, which was 250-fold higher than the highest human dose on a mg/kg body-weight basis. Systemic exposure was 6- to 11-fold higher based on AUC(0-24).
All other chemically similar drugs in this class have induced tumors in both mice and rats at multiples of 12 to 125 times their highest recommended clinical doses, on a mg/kg body weight basis.
*Based on patient weight of 50 kg.
Mutagenesis: In studies with amlodipine: Mutagenicity studies revealed no drug-related effects at either the gene or chromosome level.
In studies with atorvastatin: Atorvastatin did not demonstrate mutagenic or clastogenic potential in four in vitro tests with and without metabolic activation or in one in vivo assay. It was negative in the Ames test with Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli, and in the in vitro hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HGPRT) forward mutation assay in Chinese hamster lung cells. Atorvastatin did not produce significant increases in chromosomal aberrations in the in vitro Chinese hamster lung cell assay and was negative in the in vivo mouse micronucleus test.
Impairment of Fertility: In studies with amlodipine: There was no effect on the fertility of rats treated with amlodipine (males for 64 days and females 14 days prior to mating) at doses up to 10 mg/kg/day (8 times* the maximum recommended human dose of 10 mg on a mg/m2 basis).
*Based on patient weight of 50 kg.
In studies with atorvastatin: No adverse effects on fertility or reproduction were observed in male rats given doses of atorvastatin up to 175 mg/kg/day or in female rats given doses up to 225 mg/kg/day. These doses are 100 to 140 times the maximum recommended human dose on a mg/kg basis. Atorvastatin caused no adverse effects on sperm or semen parameters, or on reproductive organ histopathology in dogs given doses of 10 mg/kg, 40 mg/kg, or 120 mg/kg for 2 years.
MedsGo Class
Features
- Amlodipine
- Atorvastatin